↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of supported self-management for CFS/ME patients in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effectiveness of supported self-management for CFS/ME patients in primary care
Published in
BMC Primary Care, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-14-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerry Richardson, David Epstein, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Christopher Dowrick, Richard P Bentall, Richard K Morriss, Sarah Peters, Lisa Riste, Karina Lovell, Graham Dunn, Alison J Wearden, the FINE Trial Writing group on behalf of the FINE Trial group

Abstract

Nurse led self-help treatments for people with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis (CFS/ME) have been shown to be effective in reducing fatigue but their cost-effectiveness is unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 25 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 18%
Psychology 8 9%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 24 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,717,285
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#331
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,792
of 292,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.