You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparing the accuracy of two secondary food environment data sources in the UK across socio-economic and urban/rural divides
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-072x-12-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas Burgoine, Flo Harrison |
Abstract |
Interest in the role of food environments in shaping food consumption behaviours has grown in recent years. However, commonly used secondary food environment data sources have not yet been fully evaluated for completeness and systematic biases. This paper assessed the accuracy of UK Points of Interest (POI) data, compared to local council food outlet data for the county of Cambridgeshire. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 25% |
Researcher | 12 | 20% |
Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 17% |
Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
Psychology | 5 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 15% |
Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#390
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,773
of 292,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.