You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Species perceived to be dangerous are more likely to have distinctive local names
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, December 2021
Harith Farooq, Cláudio Bero, Yolanda Guilengue, Clementina Elias, Yasalde Massingue, Ivo Mucopote, Cristóvão Nanvonamuquitxo, Johan Marais, Alexandre Antonelli, Søren Faurby
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||9||39%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||9%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||4%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Postgraduate||2||10%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||2||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||5||25%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||5%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,770,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
of 750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 515,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,770,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.