↓ Skip to main content

Tracing HIV-1 transmission: envelope traits of HIV-1 transmitter and recipient pairs

Overview of attention for article published in Retrovirology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tracing HIV-1 transmission: envelope traits of HIV-1 transmitter and recipient pairs
Published in
Retrovirology, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12977-016-0299-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corinna S. Oberle, Beda Joos, Peter Rusert, Nottania K. Campbell, David Beauparlant, Herbert Kuster, Jacqueline Weber, Corinne D. Schenkel, Alexandra U. Scherrer, Carsten Magnus, Roger Kouyos, Philip Rieder, Barbara Niederöst, Dominique L. Braun, Jovan Pavlovic, Jürg Böni, Sabine Yerly, Thomas Klimkait, Vincent Aubert, Alexandra Trkola, Karin J. Metzner, Huldrych F. Günthard, The Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS)

Abstract

Mucosal HIV-1 transmission predominantly results in a single transmitted/founder (T/F) virus establishing infection in the new host despite the generally high genetic diversity of the transmitter virus population. To what extent HIV-1 transmission is a stochastic process or driven by selective forces that allow T/F viruses best to overcome bottlenecks in transmission has not been conclusively resolved. Building on prior investigations that suggest HIV-1 envelope (Env) features to contribute in the selection process during transmission, we compared phenotypic virus characteristics of nine HIV-1 subtype B transmission pairs, six men who have sex with men and three male-to-female transmission pairs. All recipients were identified early in acute infection and harbored based on extensive sequencing analysis a single T/F virus allowing a controlled analysis of virus properties in matched transmission pairs. Recipient and transmitter viruses from the closest time point to transmission showed no signs of selection for specific Env modifications such as variable loop length and glycosylation. Recipient viruses were resistant to circulating plasma antibodies of the transmitter and also showed no altered sensitivity to a large panel of entry inhibitors and neutralizing antibodies. The recipient virus did not consistently differ from the transmitter virus in terms of entry kinetics, cell-cell transmission and replicative capacity in primary cells. Our paired analysis revealed a higher sensitivity of several recipient virus isolates to interferon-α (IFNα) which suggests that resistance to IFNα cannot be a general driving force in T/F establishment. With the exception of increased IFNα sensitivity, none of the phenotypic virus properties we investigated clearly distinguished T/F viruses from their matched transmitter viruses supporting the notion that at least in subtype B infection HIV-1 transmission is to a considerable extent stochastic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 15%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2016.
All research outputs
#13,793,609
of 23,978,283 outputs
Outputs from Retrovirology
#609
of 1,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,022
of 339,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retrovirology
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,978,283 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.