↓ Skip to main content

Identification of crucial genes of pyrimidine metabolism as biomarkers for gastric cancer prognosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Cell International, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of crucial genes of pyrimidine metabolism as biomarkers for gastric cancer prognosis
Published in
Cancer Cell International, December 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12935-021-02385-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhengxin Wu, Jinshui Tan, Yifan Zhuang, Mengya Zhong, Yubo Xiong, Jingsong Ma, Yan Yang, Zhi Gao, Jiabao Zhao, Zhijian Ye, Huiwen Zhou, Yuekun Zhu, Haijie Lu, Xuehui Hong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2021.
All research outputs
#16,624,296
of 21,347,791 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell International
#783
of 1,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,746
of 464,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell International
#230
of 489 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,347,791 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,586 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 489 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.