↓ Skip to main content

Weight stigma in maternity care: women’s experiences and care providers’ attitudes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
48 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Weight stigma in maternity care: women’s experiences and care providers’ attitudes
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-13-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Mulherin, Yvette D Miller, Fiona Kate Barlow, Phillippa C Diedrichs, Rachel Thompson

Abstract

Weight stigma is pervasive in Western society and in healthcare settings, and has a negative impact on victims' psychological and physical health. In the context of an increasing focus on the management of overweight and obese women during and after pregnancy in research and clinical practice, the current studies aimed to examine the presence of weight stigma in maternity care. Addressing previous limitations in the weight stigma literature, this paper quantitatively explores the presence of weight stigma from both patient and care provider perspectives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 241 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 17%
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Researcher 20 8%
Other 18 7%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 51 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 19%
Social Sciences 25 10%
Psychology 24 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 67 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2022.
All research outputs
#474,172
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#63
of 4,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,430
of 287,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.