You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A systematic review of randomized control trials of HPV self-collection studies among women in sub-Saharan Africa using the RE-AIM framework
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, December 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s43058-021-00243-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ucheoma Nwaozuru, Chisom Obiezu-Umeh, Chisom Obi-Jeff, Thembekile Shato, Titilola Gbaja-Biamila, David Oladele, Ifeoma Idigbe, Joseph Tucker, Oliver Ezechi, Juliet Iwelunmor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 20 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 24% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,127,900
of 24,798,538 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#153
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,374
of 513,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,798,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.