You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
European cardiovascular magnetic resonance (EuroCMR) registry – multi national results from 57 centers in 15 countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-15-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oliver Bruder, Anja Wagner, Massimo Lombardi, Jürg Schwitter, Albert van Rossum, Günter Pilz, Detlev Nothnagel, Henning Steen, Steffen Petersen, Eike Nagel, Sanjay Prasad, Julia Schumm, Simon Greulich, Alessandro Cagnolo, Pierre Monney, Christina C Deluigi, Thorsten Dill, Herbert Frank, Georg Sabin, Steffen Schneider, Heiko Mahrholdt |
| Abstract |
The EuroCMR registry sought to evaluate indications, image quality, safety and impact on patient management of clinical routine CMR in a multi-national European setting. Furthermore, interim analysis of the specific protocols should underscore the prognostic potential of CMR. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 17% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 66% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 42 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2013.
All research outputs
#23,069,091
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,293
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,561
of 294,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#29
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.