↓ Skip to main content

Trends in racial/ethnic disparities in medical and oral health, access to care, and use of services in US children: has anything changed over the years?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trends in racial/ethnic disparities in medical and oral health, access to care, and use of services in US children: has anything changed over the years?
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-9276-12-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glenn Flores, Hua Lin

Abstract

The 2010 Census revealed the population of Latino and Asian children grew by 5.5 million, while the population of white children declined by 4.3 million from 2000-2010, and minority children will outnumber white children by 2020. No prior analyses, however, have examined time trends in racial/ethnic disparities in children's health and healthcare. The study objectives were to identify racial/ethnic disparities in medical and oral health, access to care, and use of services in US children, and determine whether these disparities have changed over time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 182 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 20%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Other 13 7%
Other 44 24%
Unknown 29 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 35%
Social Sciences 28 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 31 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,301,532
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,163
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,502
of 286,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.