↓ Skip to main content

Capacity of community advisory boards for effective engagement in clinical research: a mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Capacity of community advisory boards for effective engagement in clinical research: a mixed methods study
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, December 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12910-021-00733-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Levicatus Mugenyi, Andrew Mijumbi, Mastula Nanfuka, Collins Agaba, Fedress Kaliba, Irene Seryazi Semakula, Winfred Badanga Nazziwa, Joseph Ochieng

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2022.
All research outputs
#14,388,642
of 22,150,339 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#754
of 965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,612
of 500,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#103
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,150,339 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 500,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.