↓ Skip to main content

A RAD-based linkage map and comparative genomics in the gudgeons (genus Gnathopogon, Cyprinidae)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A RAD-based linkage map and comparative genomics in the gudgeons (genus Gnathopogon, Cyprinidae)
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryo Kakioka, Tomoyuki Kokita, Hiroki Kumada, Katsutoshi Watanabe, Noboru Okuda

Abstract

The construction of linkage maps is a first step in exploring the genetic basis for adaptive phenotypic divergence in closely related species by quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis. Linkage maps are also useful for comparative genomics in non-model organisms. Advances in genomics technologies make it more feasible than ever to study the genetics of adaptation in natural populations. Restriction-site associated DNA (RAD) sequencing in next-generation sequencers facilitates the development of many genetic markers and genotyping. We aimed to construct a linkage map of the gudgeons of the genus Gnathopogon (Cyprinidae) for comparative genomics with the zebrafish Danio rerio (a member of the same family as gudgeons) and for the future QTL analysis of the genetic architecture underlying adaptive phenotypic evolution of Gnathopogon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 136 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 24%
Researcher 29 20%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 16 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 16 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2015.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#8,135
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,897
of 292,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#120
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.