↓ Skip to main content

Correction with blood T1 is essential when measuring post-contrast myocardial T1 value in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction with blood T1 is essential when measuring post-contrast myocardial T1 value in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-15-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eui-Young Choi, Sung Ho Hwang, Young Won Yoon, Chul Hwan Park, Mun Young Paek, Andreas Greiser, Hyemoon Chung, Ji-Hyun Yoon, Jong-Youn Kim, Pil-Ki Min, Byoung Kwon Lee, Bum-Kee Hong, Se-Joong Rim, Hyuck Moon Kwon, Tae Hoon Kim

Abstract

Post-contrast T1 mapping by modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequence has been introduced as a promising means to assess an expansion of the extra-cellular space. However, T1 value in the myocardium can be affected by scanning time after bolus contrast injection. In this study, we investigated the changes of the T1 values according to multiple slicing over scanning time at 15 minutes after contrast injection and usefulness of blood T1 correction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 27%
Other 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 55%
Physics and Astronomy 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Energy 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2013.
All research outputs
#22,889,200
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,287
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,574
of 293,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#29
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.