↓ Skip to main content

Does neighbourhood social capital aid in levelling the social gradient in the health and well-being of children and adolescents? A literature review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does neighbourhood social capital aid in levelling the social gradient in the health and well-being of children and adolescents? A literature review
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veerle Vyncke, Bart De Clercq, Veerle Stevens, Caroline Costongs, Giorgio Barbareschi, Stefán Hrafn Jónsson, Sara Darias Curvo, Vladimir Kebza, Candace Currie, Lea Maes

Abstract

Although most countries in the European Union are richer and healthier than ever, health inequalities remain an important public health challenge. Health-related problems and premature death have disproportionately been reported in disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Neighbourhood social capital is believed to influence the association between neighbourhood deprivation and health in children and adolescents, making it a potentially interesting concept for policymakers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Unknown 271 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 17%
Student > Master 44 16%
Researcher 35 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 59 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 66 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Psychology 19 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 3%
Other 34 12%
Unknown 80 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,929,947
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,268
of 17,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,965
of 294,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#29
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.