You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy of ‘Tailored Physical Activity’ or ‘Chronic Pain Self-Management Program’ on return to work for sick-listed citizens: design of a randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-66 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lotte Nygaard Andersen, Birgit Juul-Kristensen, Kirsten Kaya Roessler, Lene Gram Herborg, Thomas Lund Sørensen, Karen Søgaard |
Abstract |
Pain affects quality of life and can result in absence from work. Treatment and/or prevention strategies for musculoskeletal pain-related long-term sick leave are currently undertaken in several health sectors. Moreover, there are few evidence-based guidelines for such treatment and prevention. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of 'Tailored Physical Activity' or 'Chronic Pain Self-Management Program' for sick-listed citizens with pain in the back and/or the upper body. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 166 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
Other | 21 | 12% |
Unknown | 50 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 16% |
Psychology | 13 | 7% |
Sports and Recreations | 12 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 7% |
Unknown | 58 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2013.
All research outputs
#13,880,538
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,988
of 14,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,164
of 280,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#191
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.