You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From descriptive to predictive distribution models: a working example with Iberian amphibians and reptiles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Zoology, May 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-9994-3-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
JW Arntzen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 3% |
| Portugal | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 171 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 115 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 42 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2021.
All research outputs
#15,279,577
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#522
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,797
of 65,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.