↓ Skip to main content

Clinical features and phylogenetic analysis of Coxsackievirus A9 in Northern Taiwan in 2011

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical features and phylogenetic analysis of Coxsackievirus A9 in Northern Taiwan in 2011
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi-Chuan Huang, Ying-Hsia Chu, Ting-Yu Yen, Wen-Chan Huang, Li-Min Huang, Ai-Ling Cheng, Hurng-Yi Wang, Luan-Yin Chang

Abstract

Coxsackievirus A9 (CA9) was one of the most prevalent serotype of enteroviral infections in Taiwan in 2011. After several patient series were reported in the 1960s and 1970s, few studies have focused on the clinical manifestations of CA9 infections. Our study explores and deepens the current understanding of CA9.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Unspecified 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2013.
All research outputs
#17,676,164
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,065
of 7,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,219
of 280,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#119
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.