You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical features and phylogenetic analysis of Coxsackievirus A9 in Northern Taiwan in 2011
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-13-33 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yi-Chuan Huang, Ying-Hsia Chu, Ting-Yu Yen, Wen-Chan Huang, Li-Min Huang, Ai-Ling Cheng, Hurng-Yi Wang, Luan-Yin Chang |
Abstract |
Coxsackievirus A9 (CA9) was one of the most prevalent serotype of enteroviral infections in Taiwan in 2011. After several patient series were reported in the 1960s and 1970s, few studies have focused on the clinical manifestations of CA9 infections. Our study explores and deepens the current understanding of CA9. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
Researcher | 6 | 14% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 12% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2013.
All research outputs
#17,676,164
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,065
of 7,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,219
of 280,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#119
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.