↓ Skip to main content

Secondary myelodysplastic syndromes identified via next-generation sequencing in a non-small cell lung cancer patient

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Secondary myelodysplastic syndromes identified via next-generation sequencing in a non-small cell lung cancer patient
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, December 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12920-021-01147-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yongzhi Feng, Xialin Chen, Keran Jiang, Ding Zhang, Feng Tao, Dan Ni, Jun Zhang, Lixin Wu, Jinping Cai, Libin Jiang, GenHua Yu, Lin Shi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#17,266,891
of 21,377,679 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#809
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#333,020
of 459,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#89
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,377,679 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.