You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing Causal Pathways and Targets of Implementation Variability for EBP use (Project ACTIVE): a study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43058-021-00245-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily M. Becker-Haimes, David S. Mandell, Jessica Fishman, Nathaniel J. Williams, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Katherine Wislocki, Danielle Reich, Temma Schaechter, Megan Brady, Natalie J. Maples, Torrey A. Creed |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Uganda | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Japan | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 20% |
| Researcher | 3 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Librarian | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 4 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,115,621
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#240
of 405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,709
of 507,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#18
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.