↓ Skip to main content

The U.S. training institute for dissemination and implementation research in health

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The U.S. training institute for dissemination and implementation research in health
Published in
Implementation Science, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen I Meissner, Russell E Glasgow, Cynthia A Vinson, David Chambers, Ross C Brownson, Lawrence W Green, Alice S Ammerman, Bryan J Weiner, Brian Mittman

Abstract

The science of dissemination and implementation (D&I) is advancing the knowledge base for how best to integrate evidence-based interventions within clinical and community settings and how to recast the nature or conduct of the research itself to make it more relevant and actionable in those settings. While the field is growing, there are only a few training programs for D&I research; this is an important avenue to help build the field's capacity. To improve the United States' capacity for D&I research, the National Institutes of Health and Veterans Health Administration collaborated to develop a five-day training institute for postdoctoral level applicants aspiring to advance this science.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 220 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 19%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 12%
Other 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 56 25%
Unknown 33 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 25%
Social Sciences 31 14%
Psychology 26 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 3%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 47 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,742,448
of 25,299,129 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#323
of 1,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,329
of 293,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,299,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.