↓ Skip to main content

Comparative genomics of bacteria in the genus Providencia isolated from wild Drosophila melanogaster

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative genomics of bacteria in the genus Providencia isolated from wild Drosophila melanogaster
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-612
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madeline R Galac, Brian P Lazzaro

Abstract

Comparative genomics can be an initial step in finding the genetic basis for phenotypic differences among bacterial strains and species. Bacteria belonging to the genus Providencia have been isolated from numerous and varied environments. We sequenced, annotated and compared draft genomes of P. rettgeri, P. sneebia, P. alcalifaciens, and P. burhodogranariea. These bacterial species that were all originally isolated as infections of wild Drosophila melanogaster and have been previously shown to vary in virulence to experimentally infected flies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Poland 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Uganda 1 1%
Unknown 70 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 8%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#5,702
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,867
of 192,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#102
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.