↓ Skip to main content

Complete genome sequence of the Antarctic Halorubrum lacusprofundi type strain ACAM 34

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiome, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complete genome sequence of the Antarctic Halorubrum lacusprofundi type strain ACAM 34
Published in
Environmental Microbiome, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40793-016-0194-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iain J. Anderson, Priya DasSarma, Susan Lucas, Alex Copeland, Alla Lapidus, Tijana Glavina Del Rio, Hope Tice, Eileen Dalin, David C. Bruce, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, David Sims, Thomas S. Brettin, John C. Detter, Cliff S. Han, Frank Larimer, Loren Hauser, Miriam Land, Natalia Ivanova, Paul Richardson, Ricardo Cavicchioli, Shiladitya DasSarma, Carl R. Woese, Nikos C. Kyrpides

Abstract

Halorubrum lacusprofundi is an extreme halophile within the archaeal phylum Euryarchaeota. The type strain ACAM 34 was isolated from Deep Lake, Antarctica. H. lacusprofundi is of phylogenetic interest because it is distantly related to the haloarchaea that have previously been sequenced. It is also of interest because of its psychrotolerance. We report here the complete genome sequence of H. lacusprofundi type strain ACAM 34 and its annotation. This genome is part of a 2006 Joint Genome Institute Community Sequencing Program project to sequence genomes of diverse Archaea.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Other 2 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Computer Science 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,205,295
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#194
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,318
of 335,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.