↓ Skip to main content

Why is it so difficult to implement a longitudinal clinical reasoning curriculum? A multicenter interview study on the barriers perceived by European health professions educators

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why is it so difficult to implement a longitudinal clinical reasoning curriculum? A multicenter interview study on the barriers perceived by European health professions educators
Published in
BMC Medical Education, November 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12909-021-02960-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Małgorzata Sudacka, Martin Adler, Steven J. Durning, Samuel Edelbring, Ada Frankowska, Daniel Hartmann, Inga Hege, Sören Huwendiek, Monika Sobočan, Nils Thiessen, Felicitas L. Wagner, Andrzej A. Kononowicz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Lecturer 3 6%
Unspecified 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 25 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Unspecified 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 26 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2022.
All research outputs
#18,359,382
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,732
of 3,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,427
of 430,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#52
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.