↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pericardial diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pericardial diseases
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-11-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Bogaert, Marco Francone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 176 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 17%
Other 28 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 30 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 69%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 33 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2021.
All research outputs
#16,827,702
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,056
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,190
of 104,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.