↓ Skip to main content

Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled study to evaluate the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on carotid atherosclerosis: the PROTECT study

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Diabetology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized controlled study to evaluate the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on carotid atherosclerosis: the PROTECT study
Published in
Cardiovascular Diabetology, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12933-016-0449-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atsushi Tanaka, Toyoaki Murohara, Isao Taguchi, Kazuo Eguchi, Makoto Suzuki, Masafumi Kitakaze, Yasunori Sato, Tomoko Ishizu, Yukihito Higashi, Hirotsugu Yamada, Mamoru Nanasato, Michio Shimabukuro, Hiroki Teragawa, Shinichiro Ueda, Satoshi Kodera, Munehide Matsuhisa, Toshiaki Kadokami, Kazuomi Kario, Yoshihiko Nishio, Teruo Inoue, Koji Maemura, Jun-ichi Oyama, Mitsuru Ohishi, Masataka Sata, Hirofumi Tomiyama, Koichi Node, On behalf of the PROTECT Study Investigators

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated strongly with an increased risk of micro- and macro-vascular complications, leading to impaired quality of life and shortened life expectancy. In addition to appropriate glycemic control, multi-factorial intervention for a wide range of risk factors, such as hypertension and dyslipidemia, is crucial for management of diabetes. A recent cardiovascular outcome trial in diabetes patients with higher cardiovascular risk demonstrated that a SGLT2 inhibitor markedly reduced mortality, but not macro-vascular events. However, to date there is no clinical evidence regarding the therapeutic effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on arteriosclerosis. The ongoing PROTECT trial was designed to assess whether the SGLT2 inhibitors, ipragliflozin, prevented progression of carotid intima-media thickness in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A total of 480 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus with a HbA1c between 6 and 10 % despite receiving diet/exercise therapy and/or standard anti-diabetic agents for at least 3 months, will be randomized systematically (1:1) into either ipragliflozin or control (continuation of conventional therapy) groups. After randomization, ipragliflozin (50-100 mg once daily) will be added on to the background therapy in participants assigned to the ipragliflozin group. The primary endpoint of the study is the change in mean intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery from baseline to 24 months. Images of carotid intima-media thickness will be analyzed at a central core laboratory in a blinded manner. The key secondary endpoints include the change from baseline in other parameters of carotid intima-media thickness, various metabolic parameters, and renal function. Other cardiovascular functional tests are also planned for several sub-studies. The PROTECT study is the first to assess the preventive effect of ipragliflozin on progression of carotid atherosclerosis using carotid intima-media thickness as a surrogate marker. The study has potential to clarify the protective effects of ipragliflozin on atherosclerosis. Trial registration Unique Trial Number, UMIN000018440 ( https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000021348 ).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 216 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 17%
Student > Master 31 14%
Researcher 19 9%
Other 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 69 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 15%
Sports and Recreations 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 79 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,861,191
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#782
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,825
of 322,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#14
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.