↓ Skip to main content

A quality improvement initiative for delayed umbilical cord clamping in very low-birthweight infants

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A quality improvement initiative for delayed umbilical cord clamping in very low-birthweight infants
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12887-016-0692-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeff Bolstridge, Tracy Bell, Barbara Dean, Amy Mackley, Gina Moore, Cheryl Swift, Dina Viscount, David A. Paul, Stephen A. Pearlman

Abstract

Due to clinical benefits, delayed cord clamping (DCC) is recommended in infants born before 37 weeks gestational age. The objective was to institute a delayed cord clamping program and to evaluate clinical outcomes one year after initiation. This study occured at Christiana Care Health System, a tertiary care facility with a 52 bed level 3 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). A multidisciplinary team created a departmental policy, a DCC protocol and educational programs to support the development of a DCC program. A year after initiation of DCC, we evaluated two cohorts of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (<1500 g) prior to (Cohort 1) and after initiation (Cohort 2) of DCC (n = 136 and n = 142 respectively). Chart review was conducted to evaluate demographic data and clinical outcomes. Analysis was completed with a retrospective, cohort analysis on an intention-to-treat basis. There were no differences in demographic factors between the two cohorts. We demonstrated a 73 % compliance rate with the delayed cord clamping protocol and a decrease in the percentage of VLBW infants requiring red blood cell transfusion from 53.7 to 35.9 % (p = 0.003). We also found a decreased need for respiratory support in the second cohort with no increases in the balancing measures of admission hypothermia and jaundice requiring phototherapy. During the Control Phase ongoing monitoring and education has led to a 93.7 % compliance rate. A multidisciplinary team including key leadership from the obstetric and pediatric departments allowed for the rapid and safe implementation of DCC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Postgraduate 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 21 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 20%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 25 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2016.
All research outputs
#19,292,491
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,451
of 3,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,111
of 325,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#25
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.