↓ Skip to main content

Identification of molecular pathway changes after spinal cord injury by microarray analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of molecular pathway changes after spinal cord injury by microarray analysis
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13018-016-0437-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haocong Zhang, Yan Wang

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is highly related to the devastating sensory and motor dysfunction. The GSE45006 gene expression profile dataset was downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus, which was collected from 24 rats including 20 animals with injured T7 spinal cords using an aneurysm clip impact-compression injury model and killed after 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 8 weeks and four sham-operated rats. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the injured rats at each time point and the sham-operated rats were screened. DEGs commonly detected throughout different time points were further identified, followed by comparing the expression level of these DEGs at each time point between the injured spinal cord samples and controls. Pathway enrichment analysis of the common DEGs was performed. The difference in the expression level of 416 common DEGs was significant between the injured spinal cord samples and the controls at each time point (P < 0.05), with the most significant difference 1 day after SCI. The common DEGs were enriched in three pathways, namely Fcγ R-mediated phagocytosis, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, and chemokine signaling pathway. AKT3 and RAC2 were enriched in all the three pathways; RAP1B in both MAPK signaling pathway and chemokine signaling pathway; and VAV1, LYN, and HCK in both Fcγ R-mediated phagocytosis and chemokine signaling pathway. This study has confirmed the occurrence of neuronal death, inflammation, and neuronal regeneration after SCI. AKT3, RAC2, VAV1, RAP18, LYN, and HCK may have critical roles in the pathological responses to SCI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,272,223
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#496
of 1,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,787
of 321,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#12
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.