↓ Skip to main content

Local knowledge held by farmers in Eastern Tyrol (Austria) about the use of plants to maintain and improve animal health and welfare

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local knowledge held by farmers in Eastern Tyrol (Austria) about the use of plants to maintain and improve animal health and welfare
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13002-016-0104-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian R. Vogl, Brigitte Vogl-Lukasser, Michael Walkenhorst

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 9 9%
Lecturer 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 35 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 7%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 39 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2017.
All research outputs
#16,443,300
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#514
of 791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,601
of 333,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.