You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Sildenafil for treating patients with COVID-19 and perfusion mismatch: a pilot randomized trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03885-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mario G. Santamarina, Ignacio Beddings, Felipe Martinez Lomakin, Dominique Boisier Riscal, Mónica Gutiérrez Claveria, Jaime Vidal Marambio, Nicole Retamal Báez, Cristian Pavez Novoa, César Reyes Allende, Paulina Ferreira Perey, Miguel Gutiérrez Torres, Camila Villalobos Mazza, Constanza Vergara Sagredo, Sebastian Ahumada Bermejo, Eduardo Labarca Mellado, Elizabeth Barthel Munchmeyer, Solange Marchant Ramos, Mariano Volpacchio, Jorge Vega |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 24 | 23% |
Brazil | 10 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Canada | 2 | 2% |
India | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 52 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 91 | 88% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Scientists | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Professor | 3 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 31 | 51% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 20% |
Engineering | 4 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 31 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 158. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2023.
All research outputs
#259,489
of 25,482,409 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#121
of 6,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,552
of 516,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#8
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,482,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.