↓ Skip to main content

The feasibility of a strategy for the remote recruitment, consenting and assessment of recent referrals: a protocol for phase 1 of the On-Line Parent Training for the Initial Management of ADHD…

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The feasibility of a strategy for the remote recruitment, consenting and assessment of recent referrals: a protocol for phase 1 of the On-Line Parent Training for the Initial Management of ADHD referrals (OPTIMA)
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40814-021-00959-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katarzyna Kostyrka-Allchorne, Claire Ballard, Sarah Byford, Samuele Cortese, David Daley, Johnny Downs, Blandine French, Cristine Glazebrook, Kimberley Goldsmith, Madeleine J. Groom, Charlotte L. Hall, Ellen Hedstrom, Zina Ibrahim, Christine Jarvis, Hanna Kovshoff, Jana Kreppner, Nancy Lean, Anna Morris, Walter Muruet Gutierrez, Kapil Sayal, James Shearer, Emily Simonoff, Margaret Thompson, Lukasz Zalewski, Edmund J. S. Sonuga-Barke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 37 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 11%
Unspecified 5 8%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 38 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2022.
All research outputs
#13,440,185
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#580
of 1,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,147,757
of 22,257,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#580
of 1,030 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,257,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,030 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.