↓ Skip to main content

Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
1114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1305 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-6-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leif J Jönsson, Björn Alriksson, Nils-Olof Nilvebrant

Abstract

Bioconversion of lignocellulose by microbial fermentation is typically preceded by an acidic thermochemical pretreatment step designed to facilitate enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Substances formed during the pretreatment of the lignocellulosic feedstock inhibit enzymatic hydrolysis as well as microbial fermentation steps. This review focuses on inhibitors from lignocellulosic feedstocks and how conditioning of slurries and hydrolysates can be used to alleviate inhibition problems. Novel developments in the area include chemical in-situ detoxification by using reducing agents, and methods that improve the performance of both enzymatic and microbial biocatalysts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 13 <1%
United States 5 <1%
France 5 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Other 9 <1%
Unknown 1260 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 273 21%
Student > Master 222 17%
Researcher 176 13%
Student > Bachelor 140 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 67 5%
Other 199 15%
Unknown 228 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 331 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 177 14%
Engineering 146 11%
Chemical Engineering 135 10%
Chemistry 68 5%
Other 147 11%
Unknown 301 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,845,241
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#58
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,330
of 290,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.