↓ Skip to main content

Estimating the frequency of causal genetic variants in foetuses with congenital heart defects: a Chinese cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimating the frequency of causal genetic variants in foetuses with congenital heart defects: a Chinese cohort study
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13023-021-02167-8
Authors

Fengying Lu, Peng Xue, Bin Zhang, Jing Wang, Bin Yu, Jianbin Liu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#16,639,218
of 20,678,629 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,890
of 2,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,035
of 436,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#266
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,678,629 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.