↓ Skip to main content

Computerized cognitive training in people with depression: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computerized cognitive training in people with depression: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13643-021-01872-6
Authors

Amit Lampit, Nathalie H. Launder, Ruth Minkov, Alice Rollini, Christopher G. Davey, Carsten Finke, Nicola T. Lautenschlager, Hanna Malmberg Gavelin

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 29%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 29%
Psychology 4 24%
Neuroscience 2 12%
Computer Science 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,196,995
of 20,765,300 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#904
of 1,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,501
of 437,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#135
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,765,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.