↓ Skip to main content

Computerized cognitive training in people with depression: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computerized cognitive training in people with depression: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13643-021-01872-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amit Lampit, Nathalie H. Launder, Ruth Minkov, Alice Rollini, Christopher G. Davey, Carsten Finke, Nicola T. Lautenschlager, Hanna Malmberg Gavelin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Unspecified 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 25%
Unspecified 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,968,721
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,007
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,536
of 513,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#22
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.