You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The SAFEST review: a mixed methods systematic review of shock-absorbing flooring for fall-related injury prevention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12877-021-02670-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy Drahota, Lambert M. Felix, James Raftery, Bethany E. Keenan, Chantelle C. Lachance, Dawn C. Mackey, Chris Markham, Andrew C. Laing |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Finland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,661,284
of 23,365,820 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#1,312
of 3,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,011
of 509,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#52
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,365,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.