You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exercise-based dysphagia rehabilitation for adults with oesophageal cancer: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-021-09155-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Gillman, Michelle Hayes, Greg Sheaf, Margaret Walshe, John V. Reynolds, Julie Regan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 7 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 19% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 52% |
| Scientists | 8 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 15% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 40 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,718,634
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#254
of 8,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,232
of 514,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#7
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,530 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.