↓ Skip to main content

A review of the nature and effectiveness of nutrition interventions in adult males – a guide for intervention strategies

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of the nature and effectiveness of nutrition interventions in adult males – a guide for intervention strategies
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pennie J Taylor, Gregory S Kolt, Corneel Vandelanotte, Cristina M Caperchione, W Kerry Mummery, Emma S George, Mohanraj Karunanithi, Manny J Noakes

Abstract

Energy excess, low fruit and vegetable intake and other suboptimal dietary habits contribute to an increased poor health and the burden of disease in males. However the best way to engage males into nutrition programs remains unclear. This review provides a critical evaluation of the nature and effectiveness of nutrition interventions that target the adult male population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 131 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Researcher 15 11%
Other 9 7%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 12%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Psychology 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 32 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,469,604
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#870
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,065
of 290,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#16
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.