↓ Skip to main content

What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What makes an effective Quality Improvement Manager? A qualitative study in the New Zealand Health System
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12913-021-07433-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adeel Akmal, Nataliya Podgorodnichenko, Tim Stokes, Jeff Foote, Richard Greatbanks, Robin Gauld

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Lecturer 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Researcher 3 4%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 36 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Engineering 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 37 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,399,526
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,057
of 7,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,128
of 504,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#62
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 504,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.