You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effects of deprivation and relative deprivation on self-reported morbidity in England: an area-level ecological study
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-072x-12-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xin Zhang, Penny A Cook, Paulo J Lisboa, Ian H Jarman, Mark A Bellis |
Abstract |
Socioeconomic status gradients in health outcomes are well recognised and may operate in part through the psychological effect of observing disparities in affluence. At an area-level, we explored whether the deprivation differential between neighbouring areas influenced self-reported morbidity over and above the known effect of the deprivation of the area itself. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 64% |
Canada | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 57 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 22% |
Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
Researcher | 11 | 19% |
Professor | 5 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 14 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Psychology | 4 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 22% |
Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2013.
All research outputs
#4,558,127
of 24,287,598 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#156
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,109
of 291,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#12
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,287,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.