↓ Skip to main content

The effects of deprivation and relative deprivation on self-reported morbidity in England: an area-level ecological study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of deprivation and relative deprivation on self-reported morbidity in England: an area-level ecological study
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-12-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Zhang, Penny A Cook, Paulo J Lisboa, Ian H Jarman, Mark A Bellis

Abstract

Socioeconomic status gradients in health outcomes are well recognised and may operate in part through the psychological effect of observing disparities in affluence. At an area-level, we explored whether the deprivation differential between neighbouring areas influenced self-reported morbidity over and above the known effect of the deprivation of the area itself.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 22%
Student > Master 12 22%
Researcher 11 20%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Psychology 4 7%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 9 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2013.
All research outputs
#3,984,442
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#133
of 627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,511
of 282,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#11
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.