↓ Skip to main content

The effects of deprivation and relative deprivation on self-reported morbidity in England: an area-level ecological study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of deprivation and relative deprivation on self-reported morbidity in England: an area-level ecological study
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-12-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Zhang, Penny A Cook, Paulo J Lisboa, Ian H Jarman, Mark A Bellis

Abstract

Socioeconomic status gradients in health outcomes are well recognised and may operate in part through the psychological effect of observing disparities in affluence. At an area-level, we explored whether the deprivation differential between neighbouring areas influenced self-reported morbidity over and above the known effect of the deprivation of the area itself.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Student > Master 12 20%
Researcher 11 19%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Psychology 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2013.
All research outputs
#4,558,127
of 24,287,598 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#156
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,109
of 291,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#12
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,287,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.