↓ Skip to main content

The reliability and validity of a Japanese version of symptom checklist 90 revised

Overview of attention for article published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The reliability and validity of a Japanese version of symptom checklist 90 revised
Published in
BioPsychoSocial Medicine, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1751-0759-2-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mitsunao Tomioka, Midori Shimura, Mikio Hidaka, Chiharu Kubo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,384,302
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#191
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,890
of 91,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.