↓ Skip to main content

Annual acknowledgement of reviewers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Molecular and Cell Biology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Annual acknowledgement of reviewers
Published in
BMC Molecular and Cell Biology, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12867-015-0032-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Sands

Abstract

The editors of BMC Molecular Biology would like to thank all our reviewers who have contributed to the journal in Volume 15 (2014).

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,754,036
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#220
of 1,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,433
of 278,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.