↓ Skip to main content

Cancer risk assessment of ethyl carbamate in alcoholic beverages from Brazil with special consideration to the spirits cachaça and tiquira

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cancer risk assessment of ethyl carbamate in alcoholic beverages from Brazil with special consideration to the spirits cachaça and tiquira
Published in
BMC Cancer, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-10-266
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk W Lachenmeier, Maria CP Lima, Ian CC Nóbrega, José AP Pereira, Florence Kerr-Corrêa, Fotis Kanteres, Jürgen Rehm

Abstract

Ethyl carbamate (EC) is a multi-site carcinogen in experimental animals and probably carcinogenic to humans (IARC group 2A). Traces of EC below health-relevant ranges naturally occur in several fermented foods and beverages, while higher concentrations above 1 mg/l are regularly detected in only certain spirits derived from cyanogenic plants. In Brazil this concerns the sugarcane spirit cachaça and the manioc (cassava) spirit tiquira, which both regularly exceed the national EC limit of 0.15 mg/l. This study aims to estimate human exposure in Brazil and provide a quantitative risk assessment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 92 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 23 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 16%
Chemistry 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#5,730,250
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,407
of 8,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,031
of 97,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#16
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,420 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.