You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ClinGen Variant Curation Interface: a variant classification platform for the application of evidence criteria from ACMG/AMP guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-021-01004-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine G. Preston, Matt W. Wright, Rao Madhavrao, Steven M. Harrison, Jennifer L. Goldstein, Xi Luo, Hannah Wand, Bryan Wulf, Gloria Cheung, Mark E. Mandell, Howard Tong, Shaung Cheng, Michael A. Iacocca, Arturo Lopez Pineda, Alice B. Popejoy, Karen Dalton, Jimmy Zhen, Selina S. Dwight, Lawrence Babb, Marina DiStefano, Julianne M. O’Daniel, Kristy Lee, Erin R. Riggs, Diane B. Zastrow, Jessica L. Mester, Deborah I. Ritter, Ronak Y. Patel, Sai Lakshmi Subramanian, Aleksander Milosavljevic, Jonathan S. Berg, Heidi L. Rehm, Sharon E. Plon, J. Michael Cherry, Carlos D. Bustamante, Helio A. Costa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| Mexico | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Greece | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 13 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 32 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,988,279
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#441
of 1,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,707
of 517,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.