↓ Skip to main content

Drug development in Alzheimer’s disease: the path to 2025

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 1,391)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
55 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
28 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
334 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
620 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drug development in Alzheimer’s disease: the path to 2025
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13195-016-0207-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey Cummings, Paul S. Aisen, Bruno DuBois, Lutz Frölich, Clifford R. Jack, Roy W. Jones, John C. Morris, Joel Raskin, Sherie A. Dowsett, Philip Scheltens

Abstract

The global impact of Alzheimer's disease (AD) continues to increase, and focused efforts are needed to address this immense public health challenge. National leaders have set a goal to prevent or effectively treat AD by 2025. In this paper, we discuss the path to 2025, and what is feasible in this time frame given the realities and challenges of AD drug development, with a focus on disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Under the current conditions, only drugs currently in late Phase 1 or later will have a chance of being approved by 2025. If pipeline attrition rates remain high, only a few compounds at best will meet this time frame. There is an opportunity to reduce the time and risk of AD drug development through an improvement in trial design; better trial infrastructure; disease registries of well-characterized participant cohorts to help with more rapid enrollment of appropriate study populations; validated biomarkers to better detect disease, determine risk and monitor disease progression as well as predict disease response; more sensitive clinical assessment tools; and faster regulatory review. To implement change requires efforts to build awareness, educate and foster engagement; increase funding for both basic and clinical research; reduce fragmented environments and systems; increase learning from successes and failures; promote data standardization and increase wider data sharing; understand AD at the basic biology level; and rapidly translate new knowledge into clinical development. Improved mechanistic understanding of disease onset and progression is central to more efficient AD drug development and will lead to improved therapeutic approaches and targets. The opportunity for more than a few new therapies by 2025 is small. Accelerating research and clinical development efforts and bringing DMTs to market sooner would have a significant impact on the future societal burden of AD. As these steps are put in place and plans come to fruition, e.g., approval of a DMT, it can be predicted that momentum will build, the process will be self-sustaining, and the path to 2025, and beyond, becomes clearer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 620 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 614 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 15%
Student > Master 86 14%
Student > Bachelor 81 13%
Researcher 76 12%
Other 31 5%
Other 90 15%
Unknown 164 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 11%
Neuroscience 65 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 46 7%
Other 140 23%
Unknown 193 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 462. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#56,398
of 24,754,968 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#13
of 1,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,219
of 326,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,754,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.