↓ Skip to main content

Clinical, epidemiological, and spatial characteristics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus diarrhea and cholera in the urban slums of Kolkata, India

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical, epidemiological, and spatial characteristics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus diarrhea and cholera in the urban slums of Kolkata, India
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-830
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suman Kanungo, Dipika Sur, Mohammad Ali, Young Ae You, Debottam Pal, Byomkesh Manna, Swapan K Niyogi, Banwarilal Sarkar, Sujit K Bhattacharya, John D Clemens, G Balakrish Nair

Abstract

There is not much information on the differences in clinical, epidemiological and spatial characteristics of diarrhea due to V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus from non-coastal areas. We investigated the differences in clinical, epidemiological and spatial characteristics of the two Vibrio species in the urban slums of Kolkata, India.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Indonesia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 93 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 22 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#5,651,924
of 21,174,193 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,940
of 13,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,717
of 277,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,174,193 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.