↓ Skip to main content

The computational-based structure of Dwarf14 provides evidence for its role as potential strigolactone receptor in plants

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The computational-based structure of Dwarf14 provides evidence for its role as potential strigolactone receptor in plants
Published in
BMC Research Notes, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-307
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noura Gaiji, Francesca Cardinale, Cristina Prandi, Paola Bonfante, Graziella Ranghino

Abstract

Strigolactones (SLs) are recently identified plant hormones modulating root and shoot branching. Besides their endogenous role within the producing organism, SLs are also key molecules in the communication of plants with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and parasitic weeds. In fact SLs are exuded into the rhizosphere where they act as a host-derived signal, stimulating the germination of the seeds of parasitic plants which would not survive in the absence of a host root to colonize. Similarly, their perception by AM fungi causes extensive hyphal branching; this is a prerequisite for effective root colonization, since it increases the number of potential contact points with the host surface. In spite of the crucial and multifaceted biological role of SLs, there is no information on the receptor(s) which bind(s) such active molecules, neither in the producing plants, or in parasitic weeds or AM fungi.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 61 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2013.
All research outputs
#20,180,477
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,552
of 4,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,344
of 164,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#84
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.