You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Strategies for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in public health: an overview of systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-022-00815-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Viviane C. Pereira, Sarah N. Silva, Viviane K. S. Carvalho, Fernando Zanghelini, Jorge O. M. Barreto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 67% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 201 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 85 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 95 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,776,344
of 25,046,311 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#397
of 1,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,626
of 514,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#12
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,311 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.