You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phase I/II trial evaluating concurrent carbon-ion radiotherapy plus chemotherapy for salvage treatment of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ai zheng Aizheng Chinese journal of cancer, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40880-016-0164-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lin Kong, Jing Gao, Jiyi Hu, Weixu Hu, Xiyin Guan, Rong Lu, Jiade J. Lu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 18% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,818,604
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Ai zheng Aizheng Chinese journal of cancer
#33
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,963
of 421,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ai zheng Aizheng Chinese journal of cancer
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.