↓ Skip to main content

Parents’ expectations of staff in the early bonding process with their premature babies in the intensive care setting: a qualitative multicenter study with 60 parents

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parents’ expectations of staff in the early bonding process with their premature babies in the intensive care setting: a qualitative multicenter study with 60 parents
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-13-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonia Guillaume, Natacha Michelin, Elodie Amrani, Brigitte Benier, Xavier Durrmeyer, Sandra Lescure, Charlotte Bony, Claude Danan, Olivier Baud, Pierre-Henri Jarreau, Elodie Zana-Taïeb, Laurence Caeymaex

Abstract

During the first weeks of hospitalization, premature babies and their parents encounter difficulties in establishing early bonds and interactions. Only a few studies have explored what caregivers can do to meet parents' needs in relation to these interactions and help optimize them. This study sought to explore parents' perception of these first interactions and to identify the actions of caregivers that help or hinder its development.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 240 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 20%
Student > Bachelor 45 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 11%
Other 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 38 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 71 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 67 27%
Psychology 27 11%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Arts and Humanities 6 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 45 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2013.
All research outputs
#2,904,387
of 3,628,172 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#556
of 656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,963
of 281,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#35
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,628,172 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 656 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.