You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The efficacy of physiotherapy upon shoulder function following axillary dissection in breast cancer, a randomized controlled study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, August 2007
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-7-166 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carien HG Beurskens, Caro JT van Uden, Luc JA Strobbe, Rob AB Oostendorp, Theo Wobbes |
Abstract |
Many patients suffer from severe shoulder complaints after breast cancer surgery and axillary lymph node dissection. Physiotherapy has been clinically observed to improve treatment of these patients. However, it is not a standard treatment regime. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of physiotherapy treatment of shoulder function, pain and quality of life in patients who have undergone breast cancer surgery and axillary lymph node dissection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 5 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Denmark | 2 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 296 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 50 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 48 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 10% |
Researcher | 27 | 9% |
Other | 22 | 7% |
Other | 61 | 20% |
Unknown | 67 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 69 | 22% |
Sports and Recreations | 15 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 7% |
Unknown | 81 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2013.
All research outputs
#15,262,171
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,099
of 8,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,582
of 68,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,253 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.