You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methodological pluralism for better evaluations of complex interventions: lessons from evaluating an innovation platform in Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-022-00814-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Bailie, F. Cunningham, S. Abimbola, A. Laycock, R. Bainbridge, R. Bailie, K. Conte, M. Passey, D. Peiris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Senegal | 1 | 4% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 63% |
| Scientists | 7 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,326,640
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#301
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,534
of 520,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#8
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.