↓ Skip to main content

Traditional use of medicinal plants by the Jaintia tribes in North Cachar Hills district of Assam, northeast India

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Traditional use of medicinal plants by the Jaintia tribes in North Cachar Hills district of Assam, northeast India
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, August 2006
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-2-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Albert L Sajem, Kuldip Gosai

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 157 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Master 19 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 6%
Other 8 5%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 46 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Environmental Science 9 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 52 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#325
of 737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,067
of 66,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.